Skip to content

| CCH Central Suite |

Welcome to the Feedback Forum for the CCH Central Suite of products. This area is for you to have your say on product enhancements or improvements that you’d like to see in future releases of the software. Enter your product idea to see and vote on related ideas or add your own idea for other customers to view and vote on.

First, enter your idea to see if it already exists.  If it does exist, click the ‘Vote’ button and select 1, 2 or 3 votes.  You have a maximum of 15 votes per product area .


This site is for product suggestions and ideas only. If you have a product query, please use the search bar on the Support Portal
home page to locate answers from our software documentation and knowledge base.  You can also use the orange Chatbot button on the homepage to request additional support.

| CCH Central Suite |

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

360 results found

  1. We would like the default delivery options - both for VAT invoices/bills and statements to be Email. Currently 'Post' is the default for all new clients - can we have a new config key so we can choose which option best suits our practice?

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  2. We frequently get frustrated when filing bulk documents and emails when we encounter a name which is common to more than one client. Because we can only see the forename and surname, it isn't possible to know which one to file against. Is it possible for the pane to show middle names (obviously where available) as this would reduce the problem significantly.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. We have had workflows terminate due to either an error on the database or with the steps on the workflow. What would be helpful is if a warning or notification box came up when a workflow terminated itself. Currently it just appears as if the task has completed and if the next step isn't assigned to the person completing the task on which it terminated then it isn't always obvious this is what has happened so could be missed.

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  4. We can see when accounts have been accepted by Companies House by checking Companies House, however CCH submissions database will still show as pending even if something has been submitted days/weeks ago. When you click on the blue pending hyperlink within the database it will then tell you it is accepted and change the blue pending hyperlink to 'Accepted'. When the database does it's polling can this field be updated so that it shows the correct position without having to manually update it.

    30 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. When trying to submit a return on the last day of the month it takes, in some cases, hours to pre-validate a return and then the same issue when trying to submit. Is there a way to speed this up?

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. It is time consuming having to tag both the members set and the small companies filing set individually, especially when having to amend any tags. For example a common tagging error is when a note spans 2 pages (not sure why the software can't recognise this) so you have to delete, adjust and amend the tag in both sets doing it twice. It would be better if the software recognised any changes to tagging made in the members set and replicated these in the filing copy.

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  7. Lead schedules that aren’t standard not pulling through, how do you pull them into workpapers? For example, debtors due in more than one year we have also seen investments schedules not pulling though previously.

    As a temporary solution we have to PDF the lead schedules from the financial statements section and upload this to work papers, but this defeats the object of the live lead schedules if the figures change.

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  8. I think it would be useful if you could change the order of Extra field groups and extra fields within the groups, I also think it would be useful if we could have extra fields that we can assign based on the entity of the client rather than being forced to have the extra fields on all clients

    8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Under review  ·  1 comment  ·  CCH Central  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  9. Add the expand and collapse option to the "Associated" tab by the relationship in the same way that you can in the "Extra" tab and "Document Centre". This would mean you could view a list of just the directors for example.

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. When sorting documents by date we have them sorted with the latest documents at the top of the search list. However we note that if there is more than 1 document that day it puts the document with the most recent timestamp at the bottom of that date list. If sorting by date order then could the time in which saved/modified/uploaded follow the same logic with the most recent at the top.

    13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  11. We appear to be running into an issue where the Workflows aren't showing a true reflection of ongoing work.
    We have three offices (Ascot, Fleet and Putney)
    If we have an Ascot Client but someone in Fleet is doing an assignment on it this will not show on the Fleet workflow, it only shows on the Ascot one.
    This is because the workflow view is looking at the responsibility level instead of the assignment level.
    We would like a separate workflow to look at the assignment level rather than the responsibility level.

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. When you create a template in CCH which has database fields you are also able to see extra fields in this list.
    If you put your extra fields in groups they no longer appear.
    We would like all extra fields in all groups to be added to the database field drop down

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Acknowledged  ·  0 comments  ·  CCH Central  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. It would be better to show tax refunds on the SA302 in brackets to distinguish it from tax underpaid which will then match the Total tax due at the end of the document

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. It would be better where the SA302 shows a tax refund for that figure to be in brackets to distinguish it from tax underpaid and to match the format of the figure for total tax due at the end of the document

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  15. Tags are being allocated automatically by the CCH on the DPL for wages. When accepting and clearing these a message pops up to say non numeric tags have been allocated and do we want to remove. If leaving them in it causes errors, removing means retagging. Support suggest this is the way that CCH is and to remove the tags. If tags are being auto allocated then can they be designed in a way which won't cause further errors.

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Restrict access to employee records from the billing screen. Currently employee record can be accessed even though the permissions restrict in a different area

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  17. It would be great if name fields eg Assignment Partners, Assignment Managers, Partners, Managers, Client Name etc could be configurable so we can show it as Firstname Lastname not Lastname, Firstname as then it would match other systems

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. It would be helpful if the three new boxes 6.1 in the SA800 relating to the export of goods and services could be opened fully so that all three boxes can be unticked rather than defaulting to neither as this means they are not exporting.
    The reporting of exporting goods and services is optional as per the SA850 guide and therefore there will be cases we do not wish to report this on. (most cases probably)

    6 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. Different lists in Central refer to Partner differently. In find client screen it is Partner, where as in Workflow it is Client partner. These should be consistent throughout the CCH suite.

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. We have been comparing figures from Acs Production against the existing MTD reports and the Other Income figure under TXOTHBUSINC is not reportable within the Personal Tax options within Reporting. It would be very useful to have this added. Thanks

    8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
1 2 5 7 9 17 18
  • Don't see your idea?