Skip to content

| CCH Central Suite |

Welcome to the Feedback Forum for the CCH Central Suite of products. This area is for you to have your say on product enhancements or improvements that you’d like to see in future releases of the software. Enter your product idea to see and vote on related ideas or add your own idea for other customers to view and vote on.

First, enter your idea to see if it already exists.  If it does exist, click the ‘Vote’ button and select 1, 2 or 3 votes.  You have a maximum of 15 votes per product area .


This site is for product suggestions and ideas only. If you have a product query, please use the search bar on the Support Portal
home page to locate answers from our software documentation and knowledge base.  You can also use the orange Chatbot button on the homepage to request additional support.

| CCH Central Suite |

Categories

JUMP TO ANOTHER FORUM

  • Hot ideas
  • Top ideas
  • New ideas
  • My feedback

405 results found

  1. We should be able to add a misc charge and estimate to complete on the same bill when using the repeat billing facillity.

    8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Under review  ·  Evan Jones responded

    Thanks for taking the time to add this to UserVoice.

    I will leave your suggestion on here in order to gauge the amount of support for it.

    Evan Jones

  2. We are producing documentation that is leaving the company, being processed by clients and then returned. Can standard reports be bar coded, so when they are returned to the organisation, our scanning solution can recognise what the document is and file accordingly. Massive scope for time savings on this request.

    8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  3. Sales invoices which are now automated export in 2019.3 still do not export the descriptions, line by line into Twinfield. The description only comes over in the 1st line only.
    This is the same with expenses.
    After each export, we have to go into each transaction and enter the description into the blank field as the transaction history is blank when users are looking for an analysis of a nominal code.
    See attached code which is blank....

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Under review  ·  Evan Jones responded

    Thanks for taking the time to add this to UserVoice.

    There are no plans to implement this.

    Evan Jones

  4. Currently CCH company secretarial produces minutes in .rtf format.

    When uploaded to the document centre, CCH cannot convert this to PDF using the button on the software to then push through One click. CCH doc centre can however convert .docx files toPDF.

    Please therefore give us the ability to save .docx files from CCH Co Sec

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  5. Currently the dividend minutes and vouchers have to be downloaded then manually uploaded into document centre.

    Would be better to be able to save the files directly to document centre like say CCH accounts production can already.

    11 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  6. It would be helpful for reporting if the comments on an expense sheet would be included in the export. We use Twinfield and so would also need the option to limit the comments box to 40 characters or for the export to cut it at 40 characters

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Under review  ·  Evan Jones responded

    Thanks for taking the time to add this to UserVoice.

    I will leave your suggestion on here in order to gauge the amount of support for it.

    Evan Jones

  7. Currently it is possible to view the WIP enquiry screen from either the client record or an assignment record.

    Most of the time our users do this from the client record and they have customised the layout accordingly - i.e. comments column added, WIP grouped by assignment and job. Occasionally though there is a need to view the WIP enquiry screen from an assignment record say when viewing an assignment based report that has a tag for the assignment WIP enquiry screen - clicking on the link.

    The problem is when viewing the WIP enquiry screen from an assignment record…

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Under review  ·  Evan Jones responded

    Thanks for taking the time to add this to UserVoice.

    I will leave your suggestion on here in order to gauge the amount of support for it.

    Evan Jones

  8. I think it would be useful if, when filing an email or document, you could also update your time sheet at the same time so that the same description can be pulled through on both.

    As is stands we are duplicating time on these tasks.

    14 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Under review  ·  Evan Jones responded

    Thanks for taking the time to add this to UserVoice.

    I will leave your suggestion on here in order to gauge the amount of support for it.

    Evan Jones

  9. There should be more information on the Companies House Filing history and status tab - like client code and client partner to give better report information

    4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. With the new employee expense sheet ability in 2019.2 to add a document, we have achieved this in Central, but have an additional request. We use Twinfield and export our expenses out of Central into Twinfield purchase ledger which are posted directly to nominals. Can the attached document in Central export to Twinfield and be able to view from the cost posted in Twinfield on the nominal account?

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Under review  ·  Evan Jones responded

    Thanks for taking the time to add this to UserVoice.

    I will leave your suggestion on here in order to gauge the amount of support for it.

    Evan Jones

  11. A back button on file maintenance would be useful instead of having to access it again from the file menu each time.

    34 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Under review  ·  0 comments  ·  CCH Central  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  12. We are currently able to bulk complete tasks on the task homepage, unless they are multi-action tasks, for example with a Yes/No outcome. It would save considerable time to be able to select numerous tasks and complete with an action box pop-up to ask if they are to be completed as a Yes or No in bulk.

    42 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Proposed  ·  2 comments  ·  CCH Workflow  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  13. The current software only looks at the date and the SEDOL number for the share transaction. This means that even though transactions may happen on the same day, they can have a different number of shares sold/purchased or purchase/selling cost but will still show up as being duplicated and be rejected from the import. This means day trading portfolios have lots of 'duplicate' transactions which have to be input manually.

    Alternatively a way in which the duplicate transactions that are flagged when imported can be authorised to be over ridden to allow the user to import them.

    9 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  14. The option to choose a recipient should be a feature on all entities, at present this can't be done for individuals where they are type "Other person". It's not always the case that the email is going to the primary email address which is likely to be that of the individual, you could be sending documents to an associated contact of the individual eg stockbroker/solicitor

    2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Under review  ·  Evan Jones responded

    Thanks for taking the time to add this to UserVoice.

    I will leave your suggestion on here in order to gauge the amount of support for it.

    Evan Jones

  15. Working papers can be edited once it has been approved by a manager/partner. It would be beneficial to "lock" the file to prevent editing after approval, or once it has been approved, requiring a separate "document release" button within the WP screen that then allows editing but then requires the file to be approved once more. Thanks

    13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  16. Currently the Step Type 'Workflow Launcher' is not available within Assignment driven Workflows, It is available in every other type of workflow except Assignment and Practice Managerment. By enabling another workflow to be launched within Assignment Workflows, this can improve communcation and interaction between departments and help with a smoother running of a practice.

    29 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  CCH Workflow  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Under review  ·  Evan Jones responded

    Thanks for taking the time to add this to UserVoice.

    I will leave your suggestion on here in order to gauge the amount of support for it.

    Evan Jones

  17. Despite this supposedly being an integrated system, I have been informed it does NOT use the lower section specific materiality (when this has been included). All that is does it to note the lower section specifically materiality under the performance materiality so you have the option to adjust if you wish.

    We therefore need, on every job where there is a lower section specific materiality to manually adjust the performance materiality (in the sample calculator) which needs to be calculated as the section materiality divided by risk factor for that area.

    It would be better if system automatically used the…

    1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  18. At the moment, once a TB has been imported from AP into AA, users can still override and make manual edits to the trial balance.

    Once an import has been done from AP, the only way users should be able to modify the data is via journals.

    Please can you consider locking this done for AP imports.
    Thanks

    3 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  19. When the licence for Review & Tag (Companies House filing) expires there is no warning given by the system. Therefore it will just lapse and suddenly the option to file accounts is greyed out and it took a while to work out why! (this happened to us on the 30th April! Can we have a pop up reminder when it is expiring like Accounts Production and other services do so at least people know why its not functioning.

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  20. If you create a link on a schedule such as Administrative Expenses, it creates a link on every single item on the page, as it is attaching the link to the range, rather than the line item you clicked to link.
    This is extremely frustrating, when trying to justify where multiple figures on a document have come from and they're all pointing at the same thing.

    Again, a poor oversight on UX that is impacting us daily, and I'm sure many others.

    7 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  • Don't see your idea?