Skip to content

Settings and activity

7 results found

  1. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Caroline Hoare shared this idea  · 
  2. 23 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Caroline Hoare commented  · 

    Further reasoning has been provided on why you must replace with an employee, which I do understand, in cases where that employee is the only person in the client team. Could the system perhaps suspend the employee. ask if we want to replace with another, if yes great, if no it does a scan of the client team and if they are the only person it flags this up and doesn't allow you to suspend until you resolve this but if there are other staff members in the client team then they get suspended.

    Caroline Hoare shared this idea  · 
  3. 128 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Caroline Hoare supported this idea  · 
  4. 2 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Caroline Hoare shared this idea  · 
  5. 20 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Caroline Hoare supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Caroline Hoare commented  · 

    With this, it would also be helpful if any member of staff can send OneClick messages on behalf of another staff member. Ignoring the review process secretaries will often type emails (messages) and send from their inbox but on behalf of the partner.

  6. 5 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Caroline Hoare shared this idea  · 
  7. 8 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Caroline Hoare supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Caroline Hoare commented  · 

    As a side note, would it be possible to put a lock on old message chains so that a client doesn't pick one up and create a brand new conversation.