5 results found
-
Review Function
I can see this has been raised a couple of times by others but subsequently declined however, it would be useful from a reviewer perspective to be able to mark individual lines within a schedule as reviewed, in the same way as you can mark individual lines as complete, as opposed to having to lock the whole schedule.
I can see that a previous response from WK has been that the assumption is that full data has been entered and so marking the whole schedule as complete is sufficient. However, I would argue that it is not sufficient as although…
18 votes -
Property expenses
It would be useful to be able to enter expenses for a property for comparative purposes and then be able to choose between the actual expenses and the £1k property income allowance.
Additionally, it is not possible to enter unused finance costs brought forward into the software when you are claiming the property allowance. Where we are claiming the property allowance and carrying forward unused finance costs, we therefore have to make a manual note of the amounts to carry forward. We should be able to record this in the relevant box to carry forward to the next tax year.
13 votes -
Property Losses brought forward and carried forward in computations
It would be extremely useful to clients to show the property losses brought forward and carried forward within the schedules to the tax return in the property income section.
4 votes -
Personal Tax Review Tool
The review tool is great for keeping review points within the system and reducing time spent, it would however be good to see the following:
-Audit of who has added notes on the PDF report
-A place to add general notes not necessarily associated to a source of income
-HICBC - this doesn't seem to be picked up as missing when in the prior year?This would enhance the product a great deal, Thanks
9 votes -
Holdover Relief
Increase the available space in the fields to enter information for items 5 and 6 on 2nd page of the form. We can currently only include 60 characters in each field, which is not enough and there is plenty of room on the form itself for more.
6 votes
- Don't see your idea?